Raconteur

Future CEO 2019

Issue link: https://raconteur.uberflip.com/i/1183196

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 1 of 7

T H E F U T U R E C E O 2 Commercial feature How to include diversity Johanna Beresford, chief executive of In Diverse Company, calls for a new approach to inclusive cultures in business ou don't need to look too far to understand the impact of the near-crippling pressure busi- ness leaders often face. Recent analysis by PwC finds the average tenure for a UK chief executive has hit a new low of just 4.8 years, dropping below the global aver- age of five years for the first time. This is down from a high of 8.3 years just nine years ago and it means 16 per cent of com- panies now change their leader every year. While the reasons are obviously varied, a common theme is the intense pressure that being at the top entails. Last month, one NHS trust chief executive announced she was quitting because the personal cost was too high. A just-published report by KPMG, which questioned 1,300 chief executives across 11 different industry sectors, finds seem- ingly new and ever-expanding worries to keep them awake at night. In addition to dealing with what 's often described as more VUCA – volatile, uncer- tain, complex and ambiguous – times and, as well as having to adapt to technolog- ical change, digital transformation and finding increasingly scarce talent, comes a new problem: environmental change. Chief executives, it finds, are "feeling investor and stakeholder pressure to move the world away from a sole reliance on fossil fuels". Against this backdrop, it can be easy to see why other, and often less tangible, issues such as creating organisations with diversity and inclusivity at their core can often be seen as just another agenda that needs looking at. There is little doubt chief executives do understand the importance of inclusive cul- ture. They know it's important for creating diversity of thought, for being more repre- sentative of their customer base and simply for being the "right thing" to champion. As the 2017 report Why Diversity Matters by consultancy McKinsey reveals, com- panies in the top quartile for gender diversity on their executive teams were more likely to have above-average prof- itability than companies in the fourth quartile. For ethnic and cultural diversity, top-quartile companies were 33 per cent more likely to outperform on profitability. However, against this is the very real fact that chief executives who take a cul- ture-first approach are a rare breed. Even though companies with inclusive cultures are proven to have higher over- all engagement rates and create the right sense of psychological safety that allows for greater inquisition and more inno- vation, deciding to put culture first and foremost can be stacked against organ- isations with more immediate profit and loss concerns. Not only do many chief executives not quite know where they should begin, often seeing culture as something that 's difficult to pin down and describe, many more are understandably uncertain how they can start to set about actually changing it. There are even academics who argue culture change is not possible at all: a tail-chasing pursuit that can only end in failure. Radical change The reality is that while wholesale cul- ture change probably is something of a tall order certainly in the short-to-me- dium term, culture is something that can very potently be nudged along in the right direction. But I believe the only way organ- isations can address the issue of inclusive cultures is to radically change the conver- sation. Future chief executives need to stop and take stock, and challenge their views about what diverse cultures actually mean and how they can be fostered. Why? It's often assumed culture always comes from the top. For some chief exec- utives, it's almost an ego-boosting notion that the culture of their business is uniquely created, and impacted by their leadership, vision, communications and values. This is only true to an extent though. In reality, organisations have a myriad of micro-cultures, comprising the collective experiences of smaller teams, and the different ways they think and interact. This is why the dialogue organisa- tions use to talk about diversity needs to change, to be much more cognizant of the power of teams. Leaders need to think about sets of teams first. As an organisation, we passionately believe, and have seen, that teams of people and team learning can make a bigger differ- ence than just individuals. But this is only the start of it. There is one crucial concept that is often missing. It's often forgotten that culture is actu- ally the by-product of what the business strategy actually needs to be. If chief executives really want to think about cul- ture, and about diversity, what they actu- ally need to do is think about the strategy of the business first. What they should not be asking is, "How do we set out a diver- sity and inclusion strategy?" but rather, "What are our specific and pressing busi- ness concerns first, and what can taking a culturally based look at this reveal?" To some this might appear overly nuanced. But for current and future chief executives, this distinction is vital to understand. Organisations need to think more about how they inspire and get the most out of their people, but in the con- text of an overall business aim, rather than tinkering around the edges by think- ing about diversity in small pockets. The reason leaders still stick to taking the transactional approach to diversity and inclusion is arguably two-fold. Most chief executives come from a corpo- rate governance or finance background, so this approach fits their traditional way of thinking. It also appears to make diversity easier to tackle. It's far more convenient for leaders to be jubilant in reporting positive changes in ethnic or gender representation. And, let 's not forget, central legislation such as recent new laws for all 250-plus employee companies to report pay gap data and diversity data also drives this thinking too. But in doing this, what leaders often fail to think about is whether it is actually moving their true cultural dial forwards. What organisations actually need is an inclusion measure, so they can connect this to business performance Y About Johanna Formerly international human resources director and then talent and learning director at Oxford University Press, Johanna Beresford is now one of very few female chief executives in the technology industry. She launched In Diverse Company in 2019 out of a strong belief there was a better way to create and measure inclusive cultures. Her platform fuses behavioural psychology, ground-breaking tech and team learning through social interaction to create temperature checks for business, complete with a complementary programme of learning. She now works with multinational organisations from all over the world to understand their inclusion aims. Yes, they may be legally compliant now, but do their measures actually meet their strategic goals? Leadership leap of faith The big shift that 's needed is to start cre- ating an actual inclusion measure in it 's own right, not to look for signs of inclu- sion from other diversity and ethnicity metrics. At the moment organisations make inclusion assumptions by linking diversity measures with business per- formance. What they actually need is an inclusion measure, so they can connect this to business performance. What leaders really need to subscribe to is a way of measuring their organisation's actual inclusion, as connected to their business issues, and use this as a starting point from which to move the needle on. At In Diverse Company, our diversity inclusion maturity model establishes just this: giving an actual inclusivity score based on a number of different met- rics, via a psychometric and organisa- tional audit which is mapped against the United Nations sustainability goals. This takes into account teams, leaders and individual inclusion scores. We work to help organisations become more inclu- sion mature and help map out the journey from point A to B. What leaders might find is their specific score can vary markedly to that of the rest of the organisation or their direct teams. But at least this enables the business to know what their cultural and inclusive starting place is, to then be able to move forward. Our targeted learning interventions do just this by looking at what we have found out from assessments and then building a bespoke set of learning interventions to move companies to where they need to be. The point is, leaders need to get a sense of how their businesses can be impacted at a strategic level. Data essentially pro- vides this new narrative. When it 's pos- sible to see how peoples' or teams' behaviours vary from their own individual attitudes, there is a powerful reason to start addressing these. The solution could be quite drastic. For instance, leaders might need to pro- mote groups of people, such as more women or those from different back- grounds, before they might be ready. Why? Because the impact of their diverse way of thinking will be better all round. The data might require leaders to make very bold decisions, but they can at least do so because it 's predicated on meeting business objectives. More realistic This new way of thinking matters because it 's probably worth considering that a common characteristic about the way most organisations are led is they tend to be steered by chief executives per- petually in search of the perfect business strategy. It 's a search, of course, which if we step back and really analyse it, is one that is simply not possible often because it 's still based on gut feeling. What leaders now, and in the future, really need to do is demonstrate a will- ingness to accept how a range of targeted interventions, to improve inclusivity and which are based on scientific and psy- chometrics-based data, can often have far greater impact. A company might, for instance, want to change its customer base entirely as part of its overall busi- ness objective. Just how well their current employees might relate to this chosen new demographic, based on team or corporate scores, could better inform leaders on how they might need to proceed. Patience, patience, patience Long-lasting change and the adoption of new attitudes to culture and inclusion are, of course, always measured by time. And so the quality chief executives will need to demonstrate the most will certainly be patience. This is in terms of how quickly inclusivity scores can be improved and how business results can be impacted. But, by at least identifying what their stra- tegic priorities are, patience should be a quality rewarded by correlations about the way a culture has to work and operate to generate business value. Patience is helped when nudges and interventions are made every day and become part of a continual learning cul- ture. That 's what we seek to achieve with all our clients. The leaders we work with are those who, thankfully, buy in to this approach. But the approach is a new one that not all organisations are currently ready for. In time, I believe taking a cultural and inclusivity temperature check, be it at the personal, team or organisational level, will become more commonplace. It has to. Outdated learning interventions that take people away from their workplace and then put them back in again, simply don't work. How can people be expected to return to their desks and act differently, when the environment and culture around them hasn't actually changed at all? For leaders of the future, it is how they go about providing the conditions for creating lasting change that will really sort the best from the not so good. Leaders who buy into the power of inclusion and the business challenges of tomorrow that it can solve really do have an opportunity to set their organisations apart. Those who truly connect what they need to do to culture, to transform their business strategies, absolutely have a bright future to look forward to. For more information please visit indiversecompany.com Email: info@indiversecompany.com Phone: +44 (0) 203 150 0000 average tenure for a UK chief executive. This is down from a high of 8.3 years just nine years ago 4.8 PwC YES, WE DO LE ARN IN GROUPS Percentage of people wanting more collaborative learning experiences 69% 71% Gen-Z Millennials 54% 56% Gen-X Boomers LinkedIn For some chief executives, it's almost an ego-boosting notion that the culture of their business is uniquely created, and impacted by their leadership, vision, communications and value more likely to outperform on profitability 33 % McKinsey For ethnic and cultural diversity, top-quartile companies were of companies now change their leader every year 16 % PwC years

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of Raconteur - Future CEO 2019