Brand and Reputation

Issue link: https://raconteur.uberflip.com/i/501672

Contents of this Issue


Page 5 of 15

REPUTATION GIDEON SPANIER Brand and reputation will grow side by side They are so interlinked that successful companies are taking a proactive, long- term approach to managing their reputation while investing in the brand W hen businesses used to plan for the future in the days before social media, they focused on building their brand rather than worrying about their reputation. While the board saw in - vesting in the brand through advertising and sponsorship as a long-term strategic goal, it tended to regard reputational is- sues as a short-term worry that could be sorted out tactically. But this idea that brand and reputation should be treated separately looks out - moded in the age of social networking and the non-stop news cycle. Now infor- mation is shared more easily, crises blow up faster, there is greater pressure for transparency, and customers and clients are increasingly likely to turn to their peers on social platforms to judge the reputation of a company, rather than just listen to one-way brand messages. BP's Deepwater Horizon oil spill disas - ter in the Gulf of Mexico in 2010 and the supermarket chain Tesco's £263-million accounting scandal in 2014 are just two examples of how a reputational problem ceased to be a short-term issue and had a long-term impact on the brand as profits and the share price slumped. In both cases, it became clear that the immediate public relations crisis raised deeper questions about senior manage - ment's long-term behaviour that had cre- ated the circumstances for these problems to escalate, be it a weak approach to safety at BP or a hard-nosed approach to suppli- ers at Tesco. BP's share price halved in the immediate aftermath of the 2010 disas- ter as claims for damages mounted and, five years later, it remains around 25 per cent lower. Tesco's stock price also nearly halved as the accounting woes had fol - lowed a loss of market share. Experts say this shows that brand and reputation have become far more inter- linked, particularly because of the grow- ing power of platforms such as Facebook, Twitter and YouTube to magnify a reputa- tion crisis. Michael Frohlich, UK chief executive of the agency Ogilvy Public Relations, says: "Reputation is built on three things – what you say, what you do and what others say about you when you're not in the room. A challenge to the first two will affect, to a lesser or greater extent, the third one. This is where the reputational damage sits, particularly on social media. If a company has a bad product or their chief executive breaks his or her promise, anyone can This ethos can be especially powerful in - ternally, as a company's own staff should be the best advocates of corporate repu- tation. There are signs that Vodafone's invest- ment in its reputation has been working. The phone giant has come under fire in the past over allegations of tax avoidance and for handing over customer data to law enforcement agencies on the orders of national governments. Vodafone has re - sponded by being more transparent. It vol- untarily publishes a report detailing how much tax it pays on a country-by-country basis and it was the first mobile company to reveal how many demands for informa - tion it has received from law enforcement agencies. It is not easy to measure the impact of such changes on Vodafone's reputation, but its wider financial performance has been strong as it agreed a record-break - ing £50-billion return to shareholders last year, following the sale of its share of America's Verizon Wireless. Mr Burt of StockWell, who has just pub- lished a book, 2020 Vision, about where business leaders see their companies at the end of the decade, says it's important to rec- ognise reputation is not always the catalyst for sales and profits to rise. Rather it can be a consequence of improved performance. "In consumer businesses, three levers drive sales and profits: product quality, simply and directly take their issues to shareholders and customers." Tim Burt, managing partner at Stock - Well, a strategic communications agency, agrees that social media has been a game-changer. "All companies suffer setbacks. It's part of doing business," he says. "What separates a setback from a crisis is loss of control, whether real or imagined. A social media firestorm – its speed, its intensity – makes any crisis harder to control. When that happens, investor confidence suffers. "Think of the HSBC tax avoidance row or the Lufthansa-Germanwings crash. BP's Deepwater Horizon fiasco in 2010 was perhaps the first crisis played out in the full glare of social media. Arguably, it has taken BP five years to recover, at the cost of major disposals, a management decapitation and damaged share price." So smart companies are learning that it pays to take a proactive, long-term approach to managing their reputation as well as investing in their brand. "It is being driven by the C-suite [chiefs in the boardroom] really recognising that rep - utation not only has a big influence on brand in today's society, but also it can change so quickly," says Jeremy Thomp- son, chief executive of the media intelli- gence company Gorkana Group. Failure to prepare means a company is at greater risk when the next crisis strikes. Matt Peacock, group corporate affairs director at Vodafone, the mobile phone giant, says: "Reputation management means doing the right thing by your customers, suppliers, shareholders, em - ployees and communities. That's doing, not just saying. In the digital age, no amount of dissimulation can hide the consequences of foolish or malign busi - ness decisions. The equation is simple – integrity builds loyalty which in turn creates value." Mr Peacock cites Blueprint for Better Business, a London-based not-for-prof- it organisation founded in 2011, as an inspiration because it re-establishes the idea that companies should have a "social purpose by providing goods that are good and services that serve". pricing and brand appeal," he argues. "A rising share price and strong reputation tend to follow. In different sectors, Apple and BMW get this right. They combine smart marketing with consistent quality, justifying premium prices that underpin rising profits. Burberry and Disney also do so. It's far harder in business-to-business sectors where success depends more on supply chain management, outstanding technology, access to resources, volume control and speed to market. In Britain, technology group ARM fits that profile." The proof is that Apple and ARM shares have more than doubled in three years, and Disney's are up 150 per cent, while BMW and Burberry have roughly tripled over the period. Reputation is an intangible asset that remains hard to value because it must be judged largely on qualitative meas - ures. Devising more quantitative met- rics to demonstrate its importance is a pressing issue for the PR industry, according to Gorkana's Mr Thomp- son, who also chairs the trade body Amec, the international association for the measurement and evaluation of communication. "A lot of heads of PR and comms have more access to the C-suite than they ever had before, and the chief executives and chief financial officers are pushing them to measure it [reputation]," he says. "PR is becoming a much more strategic tool – it's having to take itself more seriously." Amec rejects the idea that public relations and reputation should be measured in the same way as advertis - ing, which tends to equate the value of editorial coverage with the cost of the same amount of paid-for ad space – a concept known as advertising value equivalents. Instead, the trade body, which drew up a manifesto called the Barcelona Princi- ples in 2010, is keen on digital and social media data to measure "conversations" and "communities" as well as "coverage", and to link this to the effect on business results. Even so, Mr Thompson admits it is still a battle to demonstrate an exact link between reputation and a business's key performance indicators. However, Mr Frohlich of Ogilvy PR be - lieves the battle to show that reputation is as important as brand has largely been won already. "The smartest companies see that their brand and reputation are interlinked," he says. "Their brand is their promise and their reputational health is a measure of how they are delivering on that promise. Companies who align their brand and reputation can more easily ride out short-term reputational risks, as there is always a focus and connection to the longer-term brand ambition." Mr Peacock at Vodafone puts it in stronger terms: "Brand, reputation and business performance are all indivis - ible. You are what people think you are and perception is shaped by how you behave." Ultimately, the value of a reputation is that it is a store of goodwill for when the next crisis strikes. of a business's value rests on the intangible asset of its brand and reputation 38% Source: Reputation Dividend Reputation is built on three things – what you say, what you do and what others say about you when you're not in the room REPUTATION INFLUENCING BUYING DECISIONS Source: Ogilvy PR 30% of people are influenced by products and services 70% will praise or condemn an organisation based on its reputation MOST REPUTABLE COMPANIES COMPARED WITH THE LEAST 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% SUPPORT BEHAVIOUR DISTRIBUITION Buy A B Recommend products A B Trust to do the right thing A B Recommend company A B Say something positive A B NEGATIVE (1-2) A 10 MOST REPUTABLE COMPANIES B 10 LEAST REPUTABLE COMPANIES NEUTRAL (3-5) POSITIVE (6-7) NOT SURE Source: Research conducted by Reputation Institute ©, UK 2015 06 | BRAND & REPUTATION 28 / 04 / 2015 | RACONTEUR raconteur.net

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of Raconteur - Brand and Reputation